It was Ingo Swann's prediction about the existence of rings in Jupiter that convinced many people to believe in the authenticity of remote viewers. His prediction was really awe-inspiring that it also convinced me to believe that remote viewing is real. If not, then how could he guessed it right during that time. During that time, no one knows what was the real appearance of the planet Jupiter. The only thing that could explain Ingo Swann's prediction is his great talent in remote viewing.

The fact that Ingo Swann predicted the rings in the planet Jupiter does not guarantee that remote viewing is authentic. What if Ingo Swann just made a guess? It is probable that even before the Voyager probe explored the said planet, there are presuppositions made about Jupiter. I guess, Swann made his predictions out of these presuppositions. This is probably the reason some of the details he provided do not coincide with the actual details gathered by the Voyager probe.

I believe those who say that remote viewing is fake are skeptics who would not open their eyes to the fact that remote viewing is real. The case of Ingo Swann just proves that remote viewing, if done by an authentic pro, could give accurate and fast results. In fact, Ingo Swann predicted that Jupiter has rings after just a few minutes of concentration and meditation. Ingo Swann's prediction should have erased all doubts about the existence and validity of remote viewing. Well, I guess there are still a lot of people out there who are so close minded that they would not believe Ingo Swann even after achieving such a great feat in his remote viewing career.

Ingo Swann is one of the popular practitioners of remote viewing. He became famous for predicting that Jupiter has rings just like Saturn even before it was confirmed by the Voyager probe. Because of this, many really believed that Ingo Swann was really an authentic remote viewer. But was it really remote viewing skills that enabled him to do this? Or, that was just a pure guess stated vaguely? I believe it is the latter. Swann probably made an intelligent guess, and he stated it in a very vague statement in order for people to easily misinterpret his statements. I've heard that he stated that the rings are made of crystal materials. But it was proven that the rings are actually made up of dust particles of varying sizes.